欧盟对中国纯电动车关税调整，特斯拉特殊对待

与7月初的初裁结果相比，欧盟对部分中国汽车制造商的关税税率进行了小幅调整，但整体上仍然维持较高的税率水平。对于特斯拉，欧盟则单独执行9%的关税，这一决定也引发了业界的广泛讨论。

欧盟的反补贴税背景

2023年10月，欧盟委员会启动了针对中国电动汽车的反补贴调查，理由是中国电动汽车通过政府补贴在欧洲市场上获得了不公平的竞争优势，给欧洲本土汽车制造商带来了威胁。今年6月，欧盟进一步表示，将对从中国进口的电动汽车征收更高的关税，并在7月初公布了初步裁定，决定对中国电动汽车征收17.4%至37.6%的临时反补贴税。

加入“外贸微信交流群”，了解最新市场资讯！

在终裁草案中，欧盟对中国主要电动汽车制造商的关税税率进行了小幅调整。比亚迪、吉利和上汽集团的税率分别从初裁的17.4%、19.9%和37.6%调整至17.0%、19.3%和36.3%。其他配合调查的企业的税率从20.8%上调至21.3%，而对不合作企业的税率则维持在36.3%。

特斯拉关税的单独执行

特斯拉作为全球电动汽车市场的领导者，在此次欧盟反补贴税的终裁中受到特别对待。欧盟委员会决定对特斯拉实施9%的单独关税，远低于其他中国企业。这一决定引发了广泛讨论，特别是考虑到特斯拉在中国市场的广泛投资和其在欧盟市场的重要地位。

欧盟此举可能是为了平衡对市场的保护与对特斯拉这一关键市场参与者的维持。特斯拉在欧盟的低关税政策下，能够继续保持其在欧洲市场的竞争力，同时避免欧盟内部汽车市场的剧烈动荡。然而，这一决定也可能引发其他中国电动汽车制造商的不满，认为欧盟存在明显的偏袒行为。

外贸加对国际市场的分析

全球电动汽车市场正处于快速增长阶段。中国作为全球最大的电动汽车生产国和市场，凭借其庞大的生产能力和政府支持，在国际市场上占据了重要地位。欧洲则是全球第二大电动汽车市场，欧洲各国政府通过政策支持和环保法规推动本土汽车制造商向电动化转型。

然而，随着中国电动汽车在欧洲市场的扩张，欧洲本土汽车制造商面临的竞争压力也在加大。欧盟对中国电动汽车加征反补贴税，反映了其希望通过贸易保护措施来保护本土产业的意图。但这一举措可能带来一系列连锁反应，包括中欧贸易紧张局势的加剧和电动汽车全球供应链的变化。

外贸加观点：

欧盟对中国电动汽车加征反补贴税的决定，将对未来几年内全球电动汽车市场格局产生深远影响。对于中国电动汽车制造商而言，尽管面临关税压力，但他们仍将在全球市场中寻找新的增长机会。中国政府和企业可能会通过加大研发投入、提升产品竞争力，以及寻求更多国际市场来应对欧盟的贸易壁垒。

与此同时，特斯拉作为一个在中国市场深耕多年的外资企业，其在欧盟的低关税待遇可能会成为其他企业模仿的对象。未来，中欧双方是否能够通过对话协商，达成更公平、互利的贸易合作，将是决定电动汽车市场未来走向的关键因素。

总之，欧盟的反补贴税终裁草案不仅涉及中欧贸易关系，更深刻影响着全球电动汽车市场的竞争格局。在全球绿色转型的大背景下，各方如何在竞争与合作之间找到平衡，将是未来几年内需要关注的重点。

下载：2024中国新能源汽车产业发展趋势报告

Recently, the European Commission released a final draft decision on imposing countervailing duties on electric vehicles imported from China. This decision has garnered significant attention, especially in the context of the increasingly competitive global electric vehicle market. Compared to the preliminary ruling in early July, the EU has made slight adjustments to the tariff rates for some Chinese automakers, while still maintaining relatively high levels. Tesla, however, is subject to a separate 9% tariff, which has sparked widespread industry discussion.

Background on the EU's Countervailing Duties

In October 2023, the European Commission launched an anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles, arguing that these vehicles benefited from unfair government subsidies, giving them a competitive edge in the European market. This posed a threat to local European automakers. In June 2024, the EU announced plans to impose higher tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and issued a preliminary ruling in early July, setting provisional countervailing duties ranging from 17.4% to 37.6%.

In the final draft ruling, the EU made slight adjustments to the tariff rates for major Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers. The rates for BYD, Geely, and SAIC Group were adjusted from the preliminary rates of 17.4%, 19.9%, and 37.6% to 17.0%, 19.3%, and 36.3%, respectively. The rate for other cooperating companies was increased from 20.8% to 21.3%, while the rate for non-cooperating companies remained at 36.3%.

Tesla's Separate Tariff

Tesla, as a global leader in the electric vehicle market, received special treatment in the EU's final ruling on countervailing duties. The European Commission decided to impose a 9% separate tariff on Tesla, significantly lower than the tariffs on other Chinese companies. This decision has sparked widespread discussion, particularly given Tesla's substantial investment in the Chinese market and its significant presence in the EU market.

The EU's move may be an attempt to balance market protection with maintaining Tesla's role as a key market participant. Tesla can continue to maintain its competitiveness in the European market under the EU's low-tariff policy, avoiding significant disruptions to the EU's internal automotive market. However, this decision may also lead to dissatisfaction among other Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers, who may perceive the EU as being biased.

Analysis of the International Electric Vehicle Market

The global electric vehicle market is currently experiencing rapid growth. China, as the world's largest producer and market for electric vehicles, has leveraged its vast production capacity and government support to secure a significant position in the international market. Europe, the world's second-largest electric vehicle market, is driving its local automakers to transition to electrification through policy support and environmental regulations.

However, as Chinese electric vehicles expand in the European market, European automakers face increasing competitive pressure. The EU's imposition of countervailing duties on Chinese electric vehicles reflects its intention to protect domestic industries through trade protection measures. Yet, this move may trigger a series of chain reactions, including increased trade tensions between China and the EU and changes in the global electric vehicle supply chain.

Outlook and Perspective

The EU's decision to impose countervailing duties on Chinese electric vehicles will have a profound impact on the global electric vehicle market in the coming years. For Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers, despite facing tariff pressure, they will continue to seek new growth opportunities in the global market. The Chinese government and enterprises may respond to the EU's trade barriers by increasing investment in research and development, improving product competitiveness, and seeking more international markets.

At the same time, Tesla, as a foreign company deeply rooted in the Chinese market, may become a model for other companies under the EU's low tariff treatment. Whether China and the EU can achieve more equitable and mutually beneficial trade cooperation through dialogue and consultation in the future will be crucial in shaping the future of the electric vehicle market.

In summary, the EU's final draft on countervailing duties not only involves China-EU trade relations but also profoundly affects the competitive landscape of the global electric vehicle market. In the context of global green transformation, how all parties find a balance between competition and cooperation will be a key focus in the coming years.

（本文来自微信公众号“外贸加”，已授权转载，欢迎关注）